Total Commodity Programs in Madera County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 1,838
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Madera County, California totaled $258,788,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Webster Mandarin Grove LLC | Palo Alto, CA 94301 | $337,794 |
182 | Shawn Del Moss | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $330,682 |
183 | Harman Bros Gp | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $329,751 |
184 | James E Carter Md | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $328,584 |
185 | Zinke Farms Inc | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $325,155 |
186 | Growing Nuts Lp | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $322,904 |
187 | L & L Family Farms Lp | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $322,503 |
188 | Cidalia Sanchez | Madera, CA 93638 | $322,160 |
189 | Herbert & Edith Martens | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $320,834 |
190 | Quad 7 Lp | Fresno, CA 93711 | $320,067 |
191 | Mesple Family Farms, Lp | Fresno, CA 93720 | $317,137 |
192 | G & G Andrew Farms L P | Madera, CA 93637 | $316,867 |
193 | California Nut Growers Inc | Madera, CA 93638 | $315,859 |
194 | Thandi Brothers Farms Inc | Fresno, CA 93745 | $310,815 |
195 | Claudia Sue Steinauer | Madera, CA 93637 | $309,138 |
196 | G Lorenzetti & Son Farms | Fresno, CA 93706 | $309,029 |
197 | Agriland Holdings Inc | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $308,062 |
198 | Bellach Farms Inc | Madera, CA 93637 | $307,205 |
199 | Gary Bursey | Madera, CA 93637 | $307,134 |
200 | Johnny Romeri | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $306,122 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”