Farm Subsidy information
Marin County, California
Total Subsidies in Marin County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 390
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marin County, California totaled $32,667,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kullberg Farms | Petaluma, CA 94953 | $127,326 |
62 | Ielmorini Dairy Valley Ford | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $123,592 |
63 | Kenneth A Wilson-kenneth A Wilson And Clairette W | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $119,050 |
64 | John Goldbeck | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $118,704 |
65 | Stage Gulch Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $110,617 |
66 | Eugene C Poncia | Tomales, CA 94971 | $109,512 |
67 | Janet Brown Dba Allstar Organics | Woodacre, CA 94973 | $107,623 |
68 | Dolcini Bros | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $106,037 |
69 | Bill Jensen Ranches | Tomales, CA 94971 | $104,692 |
70 | Larry Peter | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $103,689 |
71 | Terry Zimmerman | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $102,390 |
72 | Victor Chiapetta | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $101,448 |
73 | Richard L Gallagher | Nicasico, CA 94946 | $99,198 |
74 | J Brand LLC | Rohnerth Park ,, CA 94928 | $96,389 |
75 | Dolcini Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $91,997 |
76 | Martin Albini | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $90,743 |
77 | Don Moreda Jr | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $90,253 |
78 | Tomas Walsh | Novato, CA 94945 | $89,042 |
79 | William Zimmerman | Marshall, CA 94940 | $88,224 |
80 | Julie Rossotti | Inverness, CA 94937 | $86,784 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”