Farm Subsidy information
Marin County, California
Total Subsidies in Marin County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 110
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marin County, California totaled $3,824,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Cynthia Dolcini Dba Leroy Dolcini Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $12,915 |
62 | Joe Pozzi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $12,838 |
63 | Eugene C Poncia | Tomales, CA 94971 | $12,708 |
64 | Debernardi Dairy Inc | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $11,787 |
65 | Kenneth A Wilson-kenneth A Wilson And Clairette W | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $11,738 |
66 | Mark L Pomi | Petaluma, CA 94953 | $11,417 |
67 | Kendrick Vineyards LLC | San Anselmo, CA 94960 | $11,395 |
68 | Andrew Cresalia | San Rafael, CA 94903 | $11,332 |
69 | Robert Giacomini Dairy Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $11,000 |
70 | John Goldbeck | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $10,148 |
71 | Freestone Ranch | Valley Ford, Ca 94, CA 94972 | $9,152 |
72 | Dolcini Bros | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $9,038 |
73 | Aaron Michael Lloyd Dba Offshore 25 | Corte Madera, CA 94925 | $8,130 |
74 | Charca Fish Viii, LLC | Mill Valley, CA 94941 | $8,015 |
75 | Js Moreda Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $7,906 |
76 | Jim Porter | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $7,855 |
77 | Sarah Gale | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $7,403 |
78 | Francis Chris Cornett | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $6,090 |
79 | Grossi George And Son Dairy | Novato, CA 94947 | $5,761 |
80 | Jerry Norman | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $5,574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”