Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Marin County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 121
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Marin County, California totaled $1,544,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rosemary Casarotti | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $17 |
102 | Adelino B Alves | Petaluma, CA 94955 | $15 |
103 | Bruce Daniels Dvm | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $13 |
104 | Bordessa Dairy | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $12 |
105 | Mary Sanchez | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $11 |
106 | Andrew J Camozzi III | Roseburg, OR 97470 | $11 |
107 | Javier Choperena | Tomales, CA 94971 | $11 |
108 | Glenn A Parks | Tomales, CA 94971 | $9 |
109 | Jerry Norman | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $9 |
110 | Volpi Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $8 |
111 | L Gwyn Burbank | Tomales, CA 94971 | $7 |
112 | Don Moreda Jr | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $7 |
113 | Dolcini Bros | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $7 |
114 | W & S Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $7 |
115 | James F Thacher | San Francisco, CA 94104 | $6 |
116 | Joe Pozzi | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $5 |
117 | Dio Choperena | Tomales, CA 94971 | $4 |
118 | Robert De La Vergne | Winston Salem, NC 27101 | $4 |
119 | Leroy Erickson | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $2 |
120 | Joyce Gilardi | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $2 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”