Total Commodity Programs in Marin County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 19 of 19
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Marin County, California totaled $83,495 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Moretti Family Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $12,016 |
2 | Dolcini Jersey Dairy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $10,792 |
3 | Spaletta Dairy | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $10,452 |
4 | Mccall Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $10,452 |
5 | Double M Dairy LLC | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $8,962 |
6 | Doug Ielmorini Dairy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $6,376 |
7 | Lafranchi Ranch | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $4,872 |
8 | Jj's Family Dairy Corp | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $4,830 |
9 | William Nunes | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $3,270 |
10 | Ielmorini Moody Dairy | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $1,988 |
11 | Kehoe Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $1,537 |
12 | Cypress Lane Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,415 |
13 | L Corda & Sons | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,415 |
14 | Robert Camozzi II | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $1,301 |
15 | R & J Mcclelland Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $1,290 |
16 | Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $1,079 |
17 | , | $750 | |
18 | Mcclellands Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $450 |
19 | Mcisaac Dairy | Novato, CA 94947 | $250 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”