Total Commodity Programs in Marin County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 25
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Marin County, California totaled $2,426,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neil Mcisaac & Son Inc | Tomales, CA 94971 | $185,893 |
| 2 | Moretti Family Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $185,261 |
| 3 | Spaletta Dairy | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $181,048 |
| 4 | James Mcisaac | Novato, CA 94947 | $180,802 |
| 5 | Lafranchi Ranch | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $178,787 |
| 6 | Kehoe Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $178,360 |
| 7 | Dolcini Jersey Dairy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $170,689 |
| 8 | Cypress Lane Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $169,363 |
| 9 | Mccall Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $163,262 |
| 10 | Double M Dairy LLC | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $162,564 |
| 11 | Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $125,864 |
| 12 | Doug Ielmorini Dairy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $102,817 |
| 13 | Jj's Family Dairy Corp | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $88,592 |
| 14 | William Nunes | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $76,550 |
| 15 | L Silva Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $55,397 |
| 16 | Ielmorini Moody Dairy | Valley Ford, CA 94972 | $55,000 |
| 17 | Robert Camozzi II | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $55,000 |
| 18 | Blakes Landing Farms Inc | Marshall, CA 94940 | $45,992 |
| 19 | E & M Deniz Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $36,363 |
| 20 | Js Moreda Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $9,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
