Farm Subsidy information
Mariposa County, California
Total Subsidies in Mariposa County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 361
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mariposa County, California totaled $24,262,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | The Crook Revocable 1992 Trust | Sonora, CA 95370 | $37,037 |
122 | Paul Leonardo | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $36,061 |
123 | Bonnie Butler | Legrand, CA 95333 | $35,433 |
124 | Donald Parker | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $35,206 |
125 | Dana A Richards | Merced, CA 95340 | $35,129 |
126 | Thomas J Jenkins | Coulterville, CA 95311 | $34,748 |
127 | Egling 30 Ranch | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $34,317 |
128 | Pat Ariaz | La Grange, CA 95329 | $33,973 |
129 | Kimberlee Dowell | Raymond, CA 93653 | $32,864 |
130 | Trevor Lee Smith | Catheys Valley, CA 95306 | $32,666 |
131 | Billy Grissom Fertilizer Spreadin | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $32,046 |
132 | Ted Anthony Dallas III | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $31,983 |
133 | Billy Grissom Fertilizer Spreading LLC | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $31,635 |
134 | Paul A Raggio | Merced, CA 95341 | $31,206 |
135 | Jason A Airola | Oakdale, CA 95361 | $29,758 |
136 | , | $28,883 | |
137 | , | $28,823 | |
138 | Allan Rosasco | Oakhurst, CA 93644 | $28,742 |
139 | Philomene Sherrell | Catheys Valley, CA 95306 | $28,557 |
140 | Gary Balmain | Coulterville, CA 95311 | $28,374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”