Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Mendocino County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 103
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $1,036,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Frank Killian | Hopland, CA 95449 | $16,492 |
22 | Kyle Stornetta | Manchester, CA 95459 | $14,613 |
23 | Dale Rex Minton | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $12,837 |
24 | W Terry Lindley | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $12,582 |
25 | Lawrence J Mailliard | Yorkville, CA 95494 | $12,197 |
26 | Ted Winter | Garberville, CA 95542 | $11,448 |
27 | Melvin W Ford | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $11,349 |
28 | Walter Niesen | Willits, CA 95490 | $11,215 |
29 | Gary Johnson | Boonville, CA 95415 | $10,375 |
30 | Douglas E King | Willits, CA 95490 | $10,311 |
31 | 41 Cattle Company, LLC | Ruth, CA 95526 | $9,739 |
32 | Brian Beeson | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $9,672 |
33 | , | $9,274 | |
34 | Joleen A Logan | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $8,794 |
35 | Richard Foreman | San Jose, CA 95135 | $8,523 |
36 | Stuart Bean | Manchester, CA 95459 | $8,496 |
37 | Bernard Eckels | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $8,159 |
38 | Celeste Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $8,147 |
39 | Elected Delegates Comm Of Eccles | Willits, CA 95490 | $7,942 |
40 | Christopher V Wilson | Covelo, CA 95428 | $7,344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”