Emergency Conservation Program in Mendocino County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 196
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $2,442,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Nicolette Ausschnitt Revocable Living Trust - Nico | Yorkville, CA 95494 | $15,548 |
42 | Richard Fetzer | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $15,519 |
43 | Stornetta Bros | Point Arena, CA 95468 | $15,315 |
44 | Thornton Pear Ranch Inc | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $15,178 |
45 | Gowan Orchards Inc | Philo, CA 95466 | $14,836 |
46 | James Martin III | Boonville, CA 95415 | $14,599 |
47 | Sharon L Freeman | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $14,464 |
48 | Jennifer Lynn Gomes | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $13,879 |
49 | Beckstoffer Vineyards | Saint Helena, CA 94574 | $13,847 |
50 | Navarro Vineyards LLC | Philo, CA 95466 | $13,206 |
51 | Max Schlienger | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $13,000 |
52 | Naomi Engstrom | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $12,700 |
53 | Christopher V Wilson | Covelo, CA 95428 | $12,363 |
54 | James Guntly II | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $12,080 |
55 | John Hall Thomas | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $11,975 |
56 | Dolan & Sons LLC | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $11,400 |
57 | Suki Dewey-white | Covelo, CA 95428 | $11,276 |
58 | Kenneth B Ingels | Talmage, CA 95481 | $10,917 |
59 | Don Colombini | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $10,671 |
60 | Jepson Vineyards Ltd | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $10,601 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”