Farm Subsidy information
Mendocino County, California
Total Subsidies in Mendocino County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 166
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $5,098,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James Ed Mitchell | Willits, CA 95490 | $22,623 |
42 | Redwood Empire Packing Inc | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $22,555 |
43 | Todd Organic Orchards Inc | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $21,234 |
44 | Thomas Edward Lemons | Boonville, CA 95415 | $19,716 |
45 | Gerald Beeson | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $19,356 |
46 | Stuart Bean | Manchester, CA 95459 | $18,924 |
47 | Tomki Vineyards LLC | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $18,162 |
48 | Eva H Johnson | Boonville, CA 95415 | $16,532 |
49 | Tim Hurt | Covelo, CA 95428 | $15,470 |
50 | Bernard Eckels | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $14,320 |
51 | Thornton Pear Ranch Inc | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $14,215 |
52 | Ted Winter | Garberville, CA 95542 | $14,149 |
53 | Christopher V Wilson | Covelo, CA 95428 | $14,095 |
54 | Kurt Akin | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $14,035 |
55 | Stornetta Bros | Point Arena, CA 95468 | $13,813 |
56 | Walter Niesen | Willits, CA 95490 | $13,794 |
57 | David A Bischop | Mendocino, CA 95460 | $13,440 |
58 | W Terry Lindley | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $13,415 |
59 | James Guntly II | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $12,080 |
60 | Placida Vineyards, LLC | Sonoma, CA 95476 | $11,247 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”