Farm Subsidy information
Mendocino County, California
Total Subsidies in Mendocino County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 166
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $5,098,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lawrence J Mailliard | Yorkville, CA 95494 | $10,886 |
62 | Douglas E King | Willits, CA 95490 | $10,875 |
63 | Clyde A Blundell | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $10,231 |
64 | Ronald Pronsolino | Yorkville, CA 95494 | $10,143 |
65 | Gary Johnson | Boonville, CA 95415 | $10,124 |
66 | Trevor Williams | Willits, CA 95490 | $9,834 |
67 | Gary Ford | Willits, CA 95490 | $9,791 |
68 | 41 Cattle Company, LLC | Ruth, CA 95526 | $9,739 |
69 | Melvin W Ford | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $9,645 |
70 | Johnson Family Ranch, Inc. | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $9,585 |
71 | John Pinches | Laytonville, CA 95454 | $9,422 |
72 | Kelan Daniel | Manchester, CA 95459 | $9,308 |
73 | Richard Foreman | San Jose, CA 95135 | $8,930 |
74 | Hildreth Farms Inc | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $8,908 |
75 | Oz Farm LLC | Point Arena, CA 95468 | $8,761 |
76 | Brian Beeson | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $8,540 |
77 | Jim Mccutchan Ranch | Cloverdale, CA 95425 | $7,718 |
78 | Vicki A Todd | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $7,500 |
79 | George Sequeira | Petaluma, CA 94954 | $7,259 |
80 | Kevin Fiorito | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $6,663 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”