Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Mendocino County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 115
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $1,398,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David G Smith Jr | Willits, CA 95490 | $7,755 |
62 | Bruce Strickler | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $7,350 |
63 | William Charles | Boonville, CA 95415 | $7,150 |
64 | Richard Boatwright | Westville, FL 32464 | $7,050 |
65 | Bernard R. Geiger | Laytonville, CA 95454 | $6,744 |
66 | Stephen N Thomas | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $6,561 |
67 | Wayne Hurt | Covelo, CA 95428 | $6,526 |
68 | Bradford Ranch | Boonville, CA 95415 | $6,341 |
69 | Alder Springs Vineyard And Alder | Belvedere Tiburon, CA 94920 | $6,097 |
70 | Anne I Thomas | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $5,960 |
71 | Michael Fitch | Danville, CA 94526 | $5,668 |
72 | Christopher Clarke | Laytonville, CA 95454 | $5,656 |
73 | Waldo S. Cook | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $5,625 |
74 | Ingel-haven Ranch | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $5,527 |
75 | Angelo Pronsolino | Philo, CA 95466 | $5,287 |
76 | Onacrest Properties/deborah Cahn | Philo, CA 95466 | $5,281 |
77 | Walter Lucchetti | Covelo, CA 95428 | $5,184 |
78 | Robert T Buich | Belvedere Tiburon, CA 94920 | $5,005 |
79 | Alexander Tom Thomas | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $4,920 |
80 | Sanel Valley Vineyards | Hopland, CA 95449 | $4,610 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”