Emergency Conservation Program in Mendocino County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 196
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $2,442,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Paul M Holleman II | Willits, CA 95490 | $8,000 |
82 | Kurt W Ashurst | Hopland, CA 95449 | $8,000 |
83 | Haiku Vineyards LLC | Larkspur, CA 94939 | $7,925 |
84 | Mike Williams | Willits, CA 95490 | $7,725 |
85 | J Cody Jones | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $7,714 |
86 | Daniel C Thomas | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $7,587 |
87 | Patricia Benedetti | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $7,563 |
88 | R Stephen Short | Willits, CA 95490 | $7,238 |
89 | Tunzi Inc | Comptche, CA 95427 | $7,148 |
90 | James M Smith | Comptche, CA 95427 | $7,000 |
91 | B & E Ranch And Timber | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $7,000 |
92 | Whispering Oak Vineyards LLC | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $7,000 |
93 | Roy Bishop | Fort Bragg, CA 95437 | $6,976 |
94 | Bree Klotter | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $6,975 |
95 | Donald R Fraser Trust | Manchester, CA 95459 | $6,971 |
96 | Armando Ruiz | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $6,957 |
97 | Brutocao Vineyards | Hopland, CA 95449 | $6,915 |
98 | Dee Runnings | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $6,500 |
99 | Jim Mccutchan Ranch | Cloverdale, CA 95425 | $6,313 |
100 | Dale Rex Minton | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $6,159 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”