Emergency Conservation Program in Mendocino County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 196
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $2,442,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Richard Myers | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $6,123 |
102 | Tim Todd | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $6,116 |
103 | Beckstoffer Vineyards Xi | Talmage, CA 95481 | $5,778 |
104 | Peter Bauer | Covelo, CA 95428 | $5,704 |
105 | Don R Fraser | Manchester, CA 95459 | $5,479 |
106 | William R Taylor | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $5,416 |
107 | John Lazaro | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $5,119 |
108 | Karyn Chun | San Leandro, CA 94577 | $5,076 |
109 | Cold Creek Ranch | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $5,051 |
110 | John E Ford | Willits, CA 95490 | $5,000 |
111 | Eric Gordon | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $5,000 |
112 | Kevin Barr | Geyserville, CA 95441 | $5,000 |
113 | Rustic Retirement LLC | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $5,000 |
114 | Kenton Schrock | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $5,000 |
115 | Graziano Vineyards | Calpella, CA 95418 | $5,000 |
116 | Elk Creamery LLC | Elk, CA 95432 | $5,000 |
117 | Humberto Nunez | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $5,000 |
118 | Van Zant's Redwood View Resort Ll | Sacramento, CA 95816 | $5,000 |
119 | Thomas J Scharffenberger | San Francisco, CA 94121 | $4,998 |
120 | Sonya Campbell | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $4,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”