Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Mendocino County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 56
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Mendocino County, California totaled $902,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Johnson Family Ranch, Inc. | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $9,585 |
22 | Kelan Daniel | Manchester, CA 95459 | $9,308 |
23 | Hildreth Farms Inc | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $8,908 |
24 | Oz Farm LLC | Point Arena, CA 95468 | $8,761 |
25 | Rosetti Bros | Hopland, CA 95449 | $6,046 |
26 | Peter Chevalier | Calpella, CA 95418 | $5,230 |
27 | Stuart Bean | Manchester, CA 95459 | $5,005 |
28 | Stephen A Biaggi | Manchester, CA 95459 | $4,941 |
29 | Tad J Kimbler | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $4,871 |
30 | Todd Brothers | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $4,026 |
31 | Tia M Satterwhite | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $3,664 |
32 | Mendocino Olive And Wine LLC | Yorkville, CA 95494 | $3,512 |
33 | Clara A Chapman | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $3,500 |
34 | Kristen Looney | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $3,317 |
35 | Arlene Colombini | Redwood Valley, CA 95470 | $3,269 |
36 | Kevin Fiorito | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $3,080 |
37 | Klm Vineyards | Ukiah, CA 95482 | $2,776 |
38 | Viridian Anderson Valley LLC | Napa, CA 94558 | $2,533 |
39 | Brutocao Vineyards | Hopland, CA 95449 | $2,458 |
40 | Ana Cox | Willits, CA 95490 | $2,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”