Cotton Ginning Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 157
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $4,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jp Souza Farms | Gustine, CA 95322 | $56,486 |
22 | Palazzo Farming Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $55,536 |
23 | Stanley Cotta Jr Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $55,156 |
24 | Favier Farms | Atwater, CA 95301 | $53,420 |
25 | David And Peggy Farmer Jv | El Nido, CA 95317 | $50,302 |
26 | Bob & Jim Bertao | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $47,824 |
27 | Germino Farms Lp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $47,150 |
28 | Christiana Santa Rita | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $44,587 |
29 | William & Rhonda Crivelli | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $43,776 |
30 | Montague Pig Farm Gp | El Nido, CA 95317 | $42,160 |
31 | Sumpter Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $40,779 |
32 | Teixeira And Sons, LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $40,000 |
33 | L And N Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $39,825 |
34 | Keith & Lori Porter Jv | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $39,668 |
35 | Gregg A Benson Farms | Merced, CA 95344 | $38,191 |
36 | Fred Oliveira | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $37,578 |
37 | Andres De Niz | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $37,158 |
38 | Fagundes Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $31,500 |
39 | M Nunes Inc | Merced, CA 95341 | $31,230 |
40 | Karen Mary Forte | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $30,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”