Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Merced County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 123
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Merced County, California totaled $2,116,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Don Arburua | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $12,266 |
22 | Dustin A Kuykendall | Denair, CA 95316 | $12,036 |
23 | Darren Lung | Merced, CA 95340 | $11,573 |
24 | Frederick Drayer | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $11,239 |
25 | Amador Zabalbeascoa | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $10,642 |
26 | Pedretti Ranches Inc | El Nido, CA 95317 | $10,254 |
27 | Anthony Parreira | Newman, CA 95360 | $10,102 |
28 | Amparan Livestock LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $9,749 |
29 | Mikel Zabalbeascoa | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $9,169 |
30 | Arthur W Richards | Raymond, CA 93653 | $8,291 |
31 | Betty Mankins | Catheys Valley, CA 95306 | $8,144 |
32 | Darrell Delerio | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $7,664 |
33 | Daniel C Butler | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $7,589 |
34 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $7,140 |
35 | John H Dambacher | Snelling, CA 95369 | $7,124 |
36 | Chad Richards | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $7,103 |
37 | David Medeiros | Denair, CA 95316 | $7,046 |
38 | Jennifer S Taylor | Merced, CA 95340 | $6,874 |
39 | Martin Machado | Winton, CA 95388 | $6,189 |
40 | Delores Cabezut-ortiz | Merced, CA 95341 | $6,147 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”