Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 176

Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $14,961,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Forage Disaster Program
1995-2023
21Menefee Hill Ranch IncLos Banos, CA 93635$214,451
22Frederick DrayerLe Grand, CA 95333$206,777
23Duane Martin LivestockIone, CA 95640$204,028
24Sierra West Livestock LLCWinnemucca, NV 89445$190,090
25Billy Grissom Fertilizer Spreading LLCHilmar, CA 95324$181,697
26Talbott Sheep Company LLCLos Banos, CA 93635$178,920
27Darrell DelerioDos Palos, CA 93620$170,156
28M And J French Ranch LLCHollister, CA 95024$165,332
29Erik O Roen Family Trust U/a/d August 27, 2004Knights Ferry, CA 95361$153,546
30Fagundes DairyChowchilla, CA 93610$150,872
31Albert J ErratchuLos Banos, CA 93635$150,279
32Hirdes Bourdet LLCHollister, CA 95023$146,788
33Kyla Michelle Prunty RiandaGustine, CA 95322$145,359
34John H DambacherSnelling, CA 95369$143,220
35Joel E CozziDos Palos, CA 93620$136,595
36Diane L. BohnaRaymond, CA 93653$120,889
37Costa Land & CattleLos Banos, CA 93635$119,804
38Jeff ChanceBallico, CA 95303$113,840
39Sloan Cattle Company LLCLos Banos, CA 93635$103,302
40Mikel ZabalbeascoaLos Banos, CA 93635$96,355

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag