Cotton Ginning Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 157
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $4,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Daniel Palermo | San Jose, CA 95125 | $29,238 |
42 | D & A Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $29,146 |
43 | Jonathan Andrews | Fresno, CA 93730 | $28,128 |
44 | Jim Vincent Farming, Inc. | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $27,086 |
45 | Bliss Farms LLC | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $25,988 |
46 | Frank J Oliveira | Gustine, CA 95322 | $25,803 |
47 | Edward J Trindade | Merced, CA 95341 | $24,370 |
48 | Cheryl R Trindade | Hot Springs Village, AR 71909 | $24,370 |
49 | Canyon Road Orchards | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $23,936 |
50 | Borelli Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $23,640 |
51 | Bernard Paradiso | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $23,509 |
52 | Herman J Menezes | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $23,430 |
53 | Menefee Hill Ranch Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $21,624 |
54 | Anthony Carlucci Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $21,574 |
55 | J & J Pereira Farms LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $21,288 |
56 | Donald J Vincent | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $20,408 |
57 | B & L Farming | Merced, CA 95341 | $20,228 |
58 | Neves Farming | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $19,900 |
59 | Bob Teicheira Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $19,793 |
60 | Daniel Fialho | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $19,462 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”