Dairy Programs in Merced County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 152
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $18,005,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Frank Gwerder Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $127,173 |
42 | Vaz Dairy | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $127,173 |
43 | T & C Louters Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
44 | Edward & Jacqueline Dejager And David De Jager | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
45 | Mike & Wendy Vander Dussen | El Nido, CA 95317 | $127,173 |
46 | Hoogendam Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
47 | Silveira Dairy Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $127,173 |
48 | Antero D Borges | Atwater, CA 95301 | $127,173 |
49 | Deolinda And Carlos Lopes Trust | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $127,173 |
50 | Charles Ahlem Ranch | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $127,173 |
51 | Rodoni Dairy Farms Lp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $127,173 |
52 | Rosa Dairy Farms | Merced, CA 95340 | $127,173 |
53 | Vander Woude Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
54 | Jose V Silveira Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $127,173 |
55 | John B Pires And Eldred C Pires Ptr | Gustine, CA 95322 | $127,173 |
56 | A J Borba Holsteins | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $127,173 |
57 | Parkview Dairy | Delhi, CA 95315 | $127,173 |
58 | 3 Machado Dairy Inc | Merced, CA 95341 | $127,173 |
59 | Double L & N Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $127,173 |
60 | Silva Dairy Farms | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $127,173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”