Dairy Programs in Merced County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 147
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $1,343,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Joe O Rocha Dairy Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $10,452 |
42 | Rodoni Dairy Farms Lp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $10,452 |
43 | Dias Family Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $10,452 |
44 | Triangle S Dairy LLC | Winton, CA 95388 | $10,452 |
45 | Robert L Silva | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $10,452 |
46 | Nunes Bros Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $10,452 |
47 | Magneson Dairy Inc | Cressey, CA 95312 | $10,452 |
48 | Antero D Borges | Atwater, CA 95301 | $10,452 |
49 | Deolinda And Carlos Lopes Trust | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $10,452 |
50 | Carlos C Lourenco | Merced, CA 95341 | $10,452 |
51 | Vista Verde Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $10,452 |
52 | Wickstrom Jersey Farms Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $10,452 |
53 | Ahlem Farms Partnership | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $10,452 |
54 | Rosa Dairy Farms | Merced, CA 95340 | $10,452 |
55 | Vander Woude Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $10,452 |
56 | Bar-mac Dairy | Merced, CA 95340 | $10,452 |
57 | Jose V Silveira Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $10,452 |
58 | John B Pires And Eldred C Pires Ptr | Gustine, CA 95322 | $10,452 |
59 | Red Top Jerseys Lp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $10,452 |
60 | A J Borba Holsteins | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $10,452 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”