Farm Subsidy information
Merced County, California
Total Subsidies in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,610
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Merced County, California totaled $908,885,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Talbott Sheep Company LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,209,594 |
42 | Vander Woude Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $2,206,809 |
43 | Silveira Brothers Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $2,200,266 |
44 | Wickstrom Jersey Farms Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $2,153,791 |
45 | Pellissier Farms | Merced, CA 95340 | $2,137,121 |
46 | Bowles Farming Company Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,123,716 |
47 | Homen Dairy Farms Lp | Merced, CA 95341 | $2,103,244 |
48 | William Sloan Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,069,937 |
49 | John B Pires And Eldred C Pires Ptr | Gustine, CA 95322 | $2,067,125 |
50 | 3 Machado Dairy Inc | Merced, CA 95341 | $2,065,563 |
51 | K & J Fischer 2008 Family Trust- Kenneth Fischer | Ballico, CA 95303 | $2,061,277 |
52 | Manuel R Goncalves Jr. | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $2,048,361 |
53 | Vaz Dairy | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,030,758 |
54 | Pafford Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,987,987 |
55 | Live Oak Farms Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $1,987,538 |
56 | Bar-mac Dairy | Merced, CA 95340 | $1,973,251 |
57 | De Jong Brothers Dairy Gp | Ballico, CA 95303 | $1,932,345 |
58 | B & L Farming | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,927,831 |
59 | Antonio Azevedo | El Nido, CA 95317 | $1,924,897 |
60 | Vista Verde Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $1,912,401 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”