Farm Subsidy information
Merced County, California
Total Subsidies in Merced County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 398
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Merced County, California totaled $28,459,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Amparan Livestock LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $110,893 |
42 | Don Arburua | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $105,211 |
43 | Godinho Dairy L.p. | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $101,067 |
44 | Eric J Cabral | Livingston, CA 95334 | $100,436 |
45 | Romero Cattle Co LLC | San Jose, CA 95109 | $95,492 |
46 | Talbott Sheep Company LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $94,122 |
47 | Jean M Arburua Survivor's Trust | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $92,404 |
48 | Duane Martin Livestock | Ione, CA 95640 | $91,249 |
49 | , | $90,800 | |
50 | Cox's Honey Farms Gp | Delhi, CA 95315 | $87,230 |
51 | Kris Ranches Lp | Merced, CA 95340 | $86,955 |
52 | Atwal Bros Farming Inc | Merced, CA 95340 | $86,855 |
53 | Frederick Drayer | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $79,985 |
54 | Ferrara Ranches Ltd Jv | San Jose, CA 95109 | $77,309 |
55 | Jose M Perez | Turlock, CA 95380 | $76,799 |
56 | Billy Grissom Fertilizer Spreading LLC | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $74,515 |
57 | Live Oak Farms Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $74,072 |
58 | Glen W Lewis | Lincoln, MO 65338 | $70,012 |
59 | Gold Hills Almond Ranch Inc | Ballico, CA 95303 | $69,802 |
60 | Roy W Richards | Snelling, CA 95369 | $66,873 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”