Loan Deficiency in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 949
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Merced County, California totaled $27,843,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Richard Clauss | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $119,722 |
42 | Macedo Dairy | Merced, CA 95340 | $119,331 |
43 | Luis C Nunes & Sons Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $119,171 |
44 | David Santos Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $115,101 |
45 | Herman Willis | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $114,131 |
46 | Martins Bros Dairy Farms Gp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $113,096 |
47 | Robert A Teicheira Jr | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $111,370 |
48 | Manuel Goncalves | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $111,097 |
49 | Buie-laveglia Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $110,311 |
50 | Bob Brandi | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $110,033 |
51 | George F Wooten | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $109,407 |
52 | De Jager Dairy North | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $107,753 |
53 | Bettencourt & Marson Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $107,669 |
54 | Shawn C Dill | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $105,092 |
55 | Arthur De Sa | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $104,829 |
56 | Philip Painter | Atwater, CA 95301 | $104,410 |
57 | Jan Painter | Atwater, CA 95301 | $103,689 |
58 | Delgado Farming | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $102,903 |
59 | L And N Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $102,414 |
60 | Frank J Gomes Dairy Lp | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $102,377 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”