Cotton Ginning Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 157
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $4,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Robert A Teicheira Jr | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $19,126 |
62 | Luneida Teicheira | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $19,126 |
63 | Anthony L Neves And Son Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $19,123 |
64 | John Locatelli | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $18,316 |
65 | Arcadian Properties Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $18,057 |
66 | Maria R Azevedo | Santa Rita Park, CA 93661 | $17,145 |
67 | George J Seasholtz | Fresno, CA 93705 | $16,778 |
68 | Joseph Marvin Nunes | Merced, CA 95341 | $16,223 |
69 | Caetano Custom Tractor LLC | Gustine, CA 95322 | $15,945 |
70 | Fagundes Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $15,532 |
71 | Gary M Lorenzo | Merced, CA 95341 | $14,443 |
72 | Dana L Lorenzo | Merced, CA 95341 | $14,443 |
73 | John D Jones | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $14,019 |
74 | Forbes Yore & Mcginn Corp | Merced, CA 95344 | $13,739 |
75 | Lisa Elgorriaga | Madera, CA 93637 | $13,493 |
76 | Tim Gomes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $13,446 |
77 | Dp Farms Inc | Patterson, CA 95363 | $12,900 |
78 | Costa Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $12,321 |
79 | Greg Pearl | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $11,733 |
80 | Marcia Pearl | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $11,733 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”