Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 205
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $2,646,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Favier Farms | Atwater, CA 95301 | $13,092 |
62 | Corey & Kristen Fagundes | El Nido, CA 95317 | $12,810 |
63 | Daniel J Fialho | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $12,757 |
64 | Germino Farms Lp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $12,694 |
65 | Dp Farms Inc | Patterson, CA 95363 | $12,652 |
66 | M Nunes Inc | Merced, CA 95341 | $11,711 |
67 | Anthony L Neves And Son Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $11,664 |
68 | J & J Pereira Farms LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $11,147 |
69 | Michael De Jager | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $11,109 |
70 | Gerrilynn De Jager | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $11,109 |
71 | Frank Coelho & Sons Lp | El Nido, CA 95317 | $10,656 |
72 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $10,358 |
73 | John Locatelli | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $9,869 |
74 | R V Dairy | Cressey, CA 95312 | $9,686 |
75 | Rodney De Jager | Merced, CA 95341 | $9,581 |
76 | Sharlene De Jager | Merced, CA 95341 | $9,581 |
77 | Bernard Paradiso | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $8,542 |
78 | Forbes Yore & Mcginn Corp | Merced, CA 95344 | $8,388 |
79 | Hcf Ranch LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $8,358 |
80 | Double G Farms Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $8,169 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”