Dairy Programs in Merced County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 147
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $1,343,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | 3 Machado Dairy Inc | Merced, CA 95341 | $10,452 |
62 | Frank Goncalves Dairy | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $10,452 |
63 | Tony L Lopes Dairy Lp | Gustine, CA 95322 | $10,452 |
64 | Ivy Star Dairy LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $10,452 |
65 | Dutch Door Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $10,452 |
66 | Silva Dairy Farms | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $10,452 |
67 | Martins View Jersey Dairy | Newman, CA 95360 | $10,452 |
68 | Amaral Dairy Farms | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $10,452 |
69 | Antonio Brasil Dairy Lp | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $10,452 |
70 | Rockshar Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $10,452 |
71 | Mark Vieira | Atwater, CA 95301 | $10,452 |
72 | John Silveira Dairy Inc | Gustine, CA 95322 | $10,452 |
73 | Jones Farms Gp | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $10,452 |
74 | Hillcrest Dairy Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $10,452 |
75 | Frank Coelho & Sons Lp | El Nido, CA 95317 | $10,452 |
76 | Parkview Dairy | Delhi, CA 95315 | $10,452 |
77 | Fanelli Family Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $10,452 |
78 | De Jager Farms South | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $10,452 |
79 | Nunes Dairy Lp | Merced, CA 95341 | $10,452 |
80 | Manuel & Maria Cardoso & Sons Dairy Ltd | Delhi, CA 95315 | $10,452 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”