Farm Subsidy information
Merced County, California
Total Subsidies in Merced County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 356
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Merced County, California totaled $41,267,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Antonio Brasil Dairy Lp | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $147,543 |
62 | Clauss Dairy Farms | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $147,083 |
63 | De Jong Brothers Dairy Gp | Ballico, CA 95303 | $146,534 |
64 | Correia Family Dairy Farms LLC | Gustine, CA 95322 | $145,083 |
65 | Wickstrom Jersey Farms Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $143,552 |
66 | Carlos C Lourenco | Merced, CA 95341 | $143,126 |
67 | Grand View Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $142,526 |
68 | Bobby Borba Dba Dairy Central | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $141,669 |
69 | Triangle S Dairy LLC | Winton, CA 95388 | $141,657 |
70 | , | $141,614 | |
71 | Vaz Dairy | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $140,761 |
72 | Pedretti Ranches Inc | El Nido, CA 95317 | $140,230 |
73 | Frank Goncalves Dairy | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $140,180 |
74 | Nunes Dairy Lp | Merced, CA 95341 | $140,092 |
75 | Sierra West Livestock LLC | Winnemucca, NV 89445 | $138,880 |
76 | , | $138,064 | |
77 | 6d Dores Dairy | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $138,046 |
78 | Martins View Jersey Dairy | Newman, CA 95360 | $137,839 |
79 | Souza Brothers Dairy | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $137,312 |
80 | Mark Vieira | Atwater, CA 95301 | $137,006 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”