Counter Cyclical Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 999
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $63,346,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Triple J Partners | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $279,509 |
62 | Pereira Brothers Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $277,985 |
63 | George L Jones | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $275,713 |
64 | Talbott Sheep Company LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $273,637 |
65 | Robert A Teicheira Jr | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $267,034 |
66 | David Santos Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $258,396 |
67 | Edward Gomes | El Nido, CA 95317 | $253,013 |
68 | Mary Gomes | El Nido, CA 95317 | $253,013 |
69 | North Wind Ag | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $252,100 |
70 | Cal Agra Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $250,856 |
71 | O'banion Ranches | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $248,398 |
72 | Borelli Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $240,410 |
73 | Anthony Carlucci Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $239,116 |
74 | Perret Farming | Merced, CA 95340 | $233,104 |
75 | Delgado Farming Inc | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $231,184 |
76 | Koda Farms Inc | South Dos Palos, CA 93665 | $229,869 |
77 | M Nunes Inc | Merced, CA 95341 | $229,030 |
78 | Live Oak Farms Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $228,362 |
79 | Rancho Delgado Lp | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $227,055 |
80 | Redfern Ranches Inc | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $211,704 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”