Total Disaster Programs in Merced County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 144
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $6,987,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Amarante Farms | Newman, CA 95360 | $28,333 |
62 | Duane Martin Livestock | Ione, CA 95640 | $28,182 |
63 | John H Dambacher | Snelling, CA 95369 | $27,599 |
64 | Bonnie Butler | Legrand, CA 95333 | $27,196 |
65 | Larry Bettencourt | Turlock, CA 95380 | $26,428 |
66 | Chris Niederhauser | Walden, CO 80430 | $24,933 |
67 | D & S Rai Farms Jv | Livingston, CA 95334 | $22,601 |
68 | Daniel Fialho | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $21,190 |
69 | Menefee Hill Ranch Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $21,064 |
70 | William C Ritts | Sonora, CA 95370 | $20,975 |
71 | , | $19,062 | |
72 | Golden Valley Partnership | Empire, CA 95319 | $17,900 |
73 | James R Furey | Planada, CA 95365 | $17,550 |
74 | Betty Mankins | Catheys Valley, CA 95306 | $17,156 |
75 | Glenn Stickles | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $16,715 |
76 | Mitchell Domingos | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $14,387 |
77 | Kenneth Morrison | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $13,820 |
78 | Ronald Richards | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $13,432 |
79 | Bill Treshler Farms Inc | Gustine, CA 95322 | $12,841 |
80 | Federico Ruesga | Turlock, CA 95380 | $11,101 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”