Market Gains in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 159
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Merced County, California totaled $5,789,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Anthony Forte | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $21,165 |
62 | Keith & Lori Porter Jv | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $20,214 |
63 | Pafford Family Farms Lp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $19,343 |
64 | Alta Aparies | Atwater, CA 95301 | $17,360 |
65 | Billy Elrod | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $17,238 |
66 | Three V Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $16,795 |
67 | Greg Pearl | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $15,703 |
68 | John Locatelli | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $15,488 |
69 | J & J Pereira Farms LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $15,145 |
70 | Jeff Asbury | Leflore, OK 74942 | $14,901 |
71 | Jim Vincent Farming | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $14,429 |
72 | Kenneth R Sadler | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $14,416 |
73 | Scoto Brothers Farming Inc | Merced, CA 95348 | $14,214 |
74 | Michael S Bliss | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $13,402 |
75 | Borelli Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $12,926 |
76 | Wes Haynes | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $12,513 |
77 | Cindy Teixeira | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $11,778 |
78 | Thomas J Teixeira | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $11,778 |
79 | Jp Souza Farms | Gustine, CA 95322 | $11,550 |
80 | Costa Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $11,478 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”