Total Commodity Programs in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,512
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $631,820,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sierra Vista Dairy Lp | Denair, CA 95316 | $1,835,295 |
62 | Vista Verde Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $1,833,683 |
63 | Rockshar Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,814,208 |
64 | Bobby Borba Dba Dairy Central | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $1,804,428 |
65 | Palazzo Farming Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,788,504 |
66 | O'banion Ranches | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,776,887 |
67 | Sherman Dairy | Winton, CA 95388 | $1,757,259 |
68 | Teixeira And Sons, LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,741,227 |
69 | Brookhurst Farms Gp | Atwater, CA 95301 | $1,695,464 |
70 | California Dairy Farms LLC | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,683,693 |
71 | Talbott Sheep Company LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,667,187 |
72 | J P M Ag | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,651,759 |
73 | Perret Farming | Merced, CA 95340 | $1,642,140 |
74 | 4-w Ranch | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,631,259 |
75 | Frenchy's Trucking | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,622,768 |
76 | B-6 Dairy Lp | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $1,612,409 |
77 | Paul P Lopes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,589,052 |
78 | Alexandrina Azevedo | El Nido, CA 95317 | $1,573,673 |
79 | Antonio Brasil Dairy Lp | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,552,520 |
80 | Jones Farms Gp | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $1,550,508 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”