Total Commodity Programs in Merced County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 742
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $34,713,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dennis Nunes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $136,683 |
62 | Hath Dairy | El Nido, CA 95317 | $136,508 |
63 | Hoogendam Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $136,022 |
64 | Den K Holsteins Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $135,617 |
65 | Jones Farms Gp | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $135,593 |
66 | Robert L Silva | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $134,645 |
67 | Frank Goncalves Dairy | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $133,918 |
68 | Pereira Brothers & Sons Gp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $133,852 |
69 | De Jong Brothers Dairy Gp | Ballico, CA 95303 | $133,207 |
70 | T & C Louters Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $133,192 |
71 | Nunes Bros Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $133,062 |
72 | Sierra Vista Dairy Lp | Denair, CA 95316 | $132,888 |
73 | Hillcrest Dairy Lp | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $132,838 |
74 | Manuel & Maria Cardoso & Sons Dairy Ltd | Delhi, CA 95315 | $132,259 |
75 | Tony L Lopes Dairy Lp | Gustine, CA 95322 | $132,189 |
76 | Silveira Dairy Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $132,144 |
77 | Luis C Nunes & Sons Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $131,838 |
78 | Wickstrom Jersey Farms Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $131,826 |
79 | 3 Machado Dairy Inc | Merced, CA 95341 | $131,007 |
80 | Luis C. Nunes And Sons 2 | Gustine, CA 95322 | $130,802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”