Total Commodity Programs in Merced County, California, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 237
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $19,980,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Nunes Dairy Lp | Merced, CA 95341 | $140,092 |
62 | , | $138,064 | |
63 | 6d Dores Dairy | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $138,046 |
64 | Martins View Jersey Dairy | Newman, CA 95360 | $137,839 |
65 | Souza Brothers Dairy | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $137,312 |
66 | Mark Vieira | Atwater, CA 95301 | $137,006 |
67 | Manuel & Maria Cardoso & Sons Dairy Ltd | Delhi, CA 95315 | $136,697 |
68 | Sunwest Jersey Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $135,870 |
69 | Gabriel Machado And Sons Dairy | Turlock, CA 95381 | $135,656 |
70 | T & C Louters Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $135,365 |
71 | Silveira Holsteins | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $135,298 |
72 | Pedretti Ranches Inc | El Nido, CA 95317 | $135,231 |
73 | Silva Dairy Farms | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $135,135 |
74 | Nunes Bros Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $134,947 |
75 | Jones Farms Gp | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $134,757 |
76 | Luis C Nunes & Sons Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $133,409 |
77 | Deolinda And Carlos Lopes Trust | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $133,170 |
78 | Rosa Dairy Farms | Merced, CA 95340 | $133,071 |
79 | Robert L Silva | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $132,391 |
80 | Luis C. Nunes And Sons 2 | Gustine, CA 95322 | $131,217 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”