Cotton Ginning Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 157
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $4,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ron Alberti | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $11,257 |
82 | Chad Crivelli | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $10,997 |
83 | D. Lapenta Farming | San Jose, CA 95125 | $10,834 |
84 | Kenneth R Sadler | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $10,291 |
85 | Pellissier Farms | Merced, CA 95340 | $9,481 |
86 | Aj Weathers Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $9,423 |
87 | P & L Farms Inc | Gustine, CA 95322 | $8,954 |
88 | Pereira Brothers & Sons Gp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $8,466 |
89 | Rick Filippini Jr | Gustine, CA 95322 | $8,039 |
90 | Matthew M Brinkley | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $7,814 |
91 | Anna Marie Pedrelli Rev Trust | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $7,446 |
92 | Castillo Bros Transport Inc. | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $6,020 |
93 | Douglas Goodman | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $5,776 |
94 | Mike K Kleiber | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $5,772 |
95 | Michael C Kleiber | Merced, CA 95341 | $5,304 |
96 | James A Areias | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $4,920 |
97 | Alice Bertao | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $4,894 |
98 | Anthony Giannone | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $4,852 |
99 | Whitney Giannone | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $4,852 |
100 | Lynda Harder | Chico, CA 95973 | $4,792 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”