Dairy Programs in Merced County, California, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 152
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $18,005,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Silveira Holsteins | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $120,508 |
82 | Nunes Bros Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $120,508 |
83 | Wickstrom Jersey Farms Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $120,508 |
84 | Homen Dairy Farms Lp | Merced, CA 95341 | $120,508 |
85 | Dias Family Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $120,508 |
86 | Robert L Silva | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $120,508 |
87 | Fred Melo | Atwater, CA 95301 | $120,508 |
88 | John S Machado | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $120,508 |
89 | Luis C Nunes & Sons Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $120,508 |
90 | Carlos C Lourenco | Merced, CA 95341 | $120,508 |
91 | Ahlem Farms Partnership | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $120,508 |
92 | Frank Goncalves Dairy | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $120,508 |
93 | Ivy Star Dairy LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $120,508 |
94 | Martins View Jersey Dairy | Newman, CA 95360 | $120,508 |
95 | Luis C. Nunes And Sons 2 | Gustine, CA 95322 | $120,508 |
96 | Antonio Brasil Dairy Lp | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $120,508 |
97 | Mark Vieira | Atwater, CA 95301 | $120,508 |
98 | Hilmar Holsteins Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $120,508 |
99 | Maria C Silveira 2011 Trust | Gustine, CA 95322 | $118,612 |
100 | Triangle S Dairy LLC | Winton, CA 95388 | $110,292 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”