Counter Cyclical Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 999
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $63,346,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Machado Brothers Gp | Turlock, CA 95381 | $199,530 |
82 | Ronnie Goodman | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $197,685 |
83 | Bill Goodman | Merced, CA 95340 | $194,482 |
84 | Paul Goodman | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $193,863 |
85 | Mike K Kleiber | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $193,071 |
86 | J & J Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $188,148 |
87 | Bob Teicheira Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $186,528 |
88 | Michael L Bliss | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $185,424 |
89 | Bernard Paradiso | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $185,034 |
90 | T-mac Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $184,504 |
91 | Vaz Dairy | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $180,752 |
92 | Catrina Farms LLC | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $175,816 |
93 | Suzanne Redfern-west | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $169,780 |
94 | Jack Wooten Jr Ranch | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $158,984 |
95 | Keith Hamilton | Whitehall, MT 59759 | $156,729 |
96 | Del Bosque Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $154,715 |
97 | Pereira Brothers & Sons Gp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $154,598 |
98 | Rebecca Ferreira | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $151,633 |
99 | Arcadian Properties Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $151,459 |
100 | Sharon Goodman | Merced, CA 95340 | $148,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”