Deficiency Payment in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 382
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Merced County, California totaled $1,580,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Robert Flynn | Merced, CA 95340 | $1,919 |
82 | Menefee Hill Ranch Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,884 |
83 | John J Areias | Fresno, CA 93722 | $1,878 |
84 | John Tristao Jr | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,875 |
85 | Merced River Nursery Inc | Snelling, CA 95369 | $1,868 |
86 | Edward Gomes | El Nido, CA 95317 | $1,858 |
87 | Mary Gomes | El Nido, CA 95317 | $1,858 |
88 | The Village Of Laguna San Luis Pt | Las Vegas, NV 89118 | $1,846 |
89 | Miller Farming Company | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,830 |
90 | Alan Sagouspe | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,788 |
91 | Tambra Sagouspe | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,788 |
92 | Augusto Lima | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,783 |
93 | Maino & Van Waay | San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 | $1,757 |
94 | Anthony Vallelunga | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $1,744 |
95 | Areias Dairy Farms | Fresno, CA 93701 | $1,603 |
96 | Estee Strombotne | Fresno, CA 93704 | $1,593 |
97 | Henrik Strombotne | Merced, CA 95340 | $1,593 |
98 | Everett J Vaz | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,581 |
99 | Colleen P Trieweiler | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,440 |
100 | James Luker | Merced, CA 95340 | $1,425 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”