Market Gains in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 159
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Merced County, California totaled $5,789,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joseph Marvin Nunes | Merced, CA 95341 | $10,979 |
82 | Jonathan Andrews | Fresno, CA 93730 | $10,776 |
83 | Gary M Lorenzo | Merced, CA 95341 | $10,656 |
84 | Dana L Lorenzo | Merced, CA 95341 | $10,656 |
85 | Tim Gomes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $10,531 |
86 | Karen Mary Forte | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $10,500 |
87 | Martin S Howard Dba Tierra Linda | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $10,293 |
88 | Bliss Farms LLC | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $10,187 |
89 | Aaron- Aaron And Jen Barcellos | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $9,653 |
90 | Aric- Aric And Stace Barcellos | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $9,653 |
91 | Stacee Barcellos | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $9,653 |
92 | Jennifer Barcellos | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $9,653 |
93 | Louie L Azevedo | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $9,605 |
94 | Arnold- Arnold And T Barcellos | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $9,085 |
95 | Teresina Barcellos | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $9,085 |
96 | Forbes Yore & Mcginn Corp | Merced, CA 95344 | $8,827 |
97 | Arcadian Properties Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $8,433 |
98 | Mildred Willis Estate | Kerman, CA 93630 | $8,021 |
99 | Herman Willis Trust | Kerman, CA 93630 | $8,021 |
100 | Caetano Custom Tractor LLC | Gustine, CA 95322 | $7,603 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”