Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 417
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Merced County, California totaled $14,130,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | John S Machado | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $45,769 |
82 | L And N Farms | Merced, CA 95341 | $45,743 |
83 | Lisa Elgorriaga | Madera, CA 93637 | $44,053 |
84 | Sherman Dairy | Winton, CA 95388 | $43,470 |
85 | Christiana Santa Rita | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $43,074 |
86 | Hoogendam Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $42,866 |
87 | Fred Melo | Atwater, CA 95301 | $42,666 |
88 | Andres De Niz | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $40,823 |
89 | Santa Anna Farms LLC | Merced, CA 95341 | $40,590 |
90 | 4-w Ranch | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $39,613 |
91 | Forebay Farms LLC | Merced, CA 95344 | $39,500 |
92 | Christopher G Crivelli | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $38,459 |
93 | J & J Pereira Farms LLC | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $38,163 |
94 | Denis Nunes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $37,580 |
95 | Forbes Yore & Mcginn Corp | Merced, CA 95344 | $37,421 |
96 | Don Arburua | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $37,243 |
97 | Silveira Brothers Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $37,152 |
98 | Bradford Nyman | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $37,035 |
99 | Antonio Brasil Dairy Lp | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $36,433 |
100 | De Jong Brothers Dairy Gp | Ballico, CA 95303 | $36,202 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”