Total Commodity Programs in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,512
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $631,820,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | P A J Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,540,085 |
82 | Beames Farms | Aromas, CA 95004 | $1,539,767 |
83 | Parkview Dairy | Delhi, CA 95315 | $1,519,156 |
84 | Matos Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,516,107 |
85 | Alves And Son Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $1,511,829 |
86 | C A J Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,476,960 |
87 | Germino Farms Lp | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,475,055 |
88 | Barcellos Et Al | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $1,466,646 |
89 | De Jager Farms South | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $1,457,232 |
90 | Tony L Lopes Dairy Lp | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,454,315 |
91 | Martin De Jager- Martin & Carolyn Dejager Family T | Merced, CA 95340 | $1,452,434 |
92 | Joe M Oliveira Dairy Jv | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $1,450,784 |
93 | Souza Brothers Dairy | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $1,445,367 |
94 | Gm Silva Dairies General Partnership | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $1,442,286 |
95 | D & A Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,438,249 |
96 | Dennis Nunes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,433,223 |
97 | Luis C Nunes & Sons Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,418,085 |
98 | David Santos Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,417,312 |
99 | Nickel Family LLC | Bakersfield, CA 93386 | $1,410,178 |
100 | Correia Family Dairy Farms LLC | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,409,216 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”