Counter Cyclical Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 999
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $63,346,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Kim Goodman | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $146,656 |
102 | Rascal Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $146,138 |
103 | Cipriani Farms | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $143,008 |
104 | Mary Goodman | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $142,738 |
105 | S H Smith Farms Inc | Turlock, CA 95381 | $142,103 |
106 | Costa Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $140,553 |
107 | John W Palmer Farms Inc | Turlock, CA 95381 | $137,900 |
108 | Shad Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $137,554 |
109 | John Locatelli | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $135,966 |
110 | Gregg Benson Farms | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $135,494 |
111 | Brookhurst Farms Gp | Atwater, CA 95301 | $135,178 |
112 | Ramos Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $134,824 |
113 | Stuart J Smith Farms Inc | Turlock, CA 95381 | $134,086 |
114 | Manuel Goncalves | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $134,047 |
115 | Turlock Fruit Co Inc | Turlock, CA 95381 | $128,615 |
116 | John Ferreira | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $126,569 |
117 | William E Cantrell III | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $126,465 |
118 | Tamera Cantrell | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $126,465 |
119 | Triple J Partners 2 | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $126,173 |
120 | Gabriel G Locatelli | Santa Rita Park, CA 93661 | $125,638 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”