Total Emergency Relief Program in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 150
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Merced County, California totaled $11,102,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jim Vincent | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $18,420 |
102 | Kelly Vincent | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $18,420 |
103 | Jim O Robsion | Snelling, CA 95369 | $18,364 |
104 | Golden Valley Partnership | Empire, CA 95319 | $17,900 |
105 | Robert A Teicheira Jr | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $17,749 |
106 | Kenneth R Sadler | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $17,078 |
107 | Richard Post | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $15,945 |
108 | Paramjit Singh | Milpitas, CA 95035 | $15,869 |
109 | Manjit Bains | Milpitas, CA 95035 | $15,869 |
110 | Veronica Espinosa | Delhi, CA 95315 | $15,274 |
111 | Jesse Mota | Livingston, CA 95334 | $15,221 |
112 | O'shana Larson Farms | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $14,352 |
113 | Fiorini Ranch | Turlock, CA 95380 | $13,619 |
114 | Rodney Voumard | Turlock, CA 95380 | $13,307 |
115 | Bill Treshler Farms Inc | Gustine, CA 95322 | $12,841 |
116 | Charles Eck | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $12,271 |
117 | Mohan S Johal | Atwater, CA 95301 | $11,913 |
118 | , | $11,102 | |
119 | Federico Ruesga | Turlock, CA 95380 | $11,101 |
120 | Balvir Kaur | Turlock, CA 95382 | $11,087 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”