Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Merced County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 417

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Merced County, California totaled $14,130,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2023
101Antonio Brasil DairyDos Palos, CA 93620$35,944
102Deolinda And Carlos Lopes TrustLos Banos, CA 93635$35,875
103Chad CrivelliDos Palos, CA 93620$34,095
104Robert L SilvaLos Banos, CA 93635$32,761
105Edward & Jacqueline Dejager And David De JagerMerced, CA 95341$32,572
106Bettencourt & Marson DairyHilmar, CA 95324$31,785
107Kenneth R SadlerLos Banos, CA 93635$31,683
108Fagundes Fagundes FagundesMerced, CA 95348$30,917
109Billy Grissom Fertilizer Spreading LLCHilmar, CA 95324$30,303
110Marchini Farms Lp Dba Santa Fe FarmsLe Grand, CA 95333$30,293
111Coelho Farms LpChowchilla, CA 93610$30,141
112Frank A Azevedo IIGustine, CA 95322$29,783
113Ronald D GrinderLe Grand, CA 95333$29,154
114Jose A NunesLos Banos, CA 93635$28,849
115Odete NunesLos Banos, CA 93635$28,849
116Jackson Land & Cattle LpLivermore, CA 94551$28,340
117Anthony VallelungaLe Grand, CA 95333$28,056
118Tony L Lopes Dairy LpGustine, CA 95322$27,658
119Cheryl R TrindadeHot Springs Village, AR 71909$27,391
120Beames FarmsAromas, CA 95004$27,313

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag