Dairy Programs in Merced County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 147
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Merced County, California totaled $1,343,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Joe Soares Dairy | Delhi, CA 95315 | $2,829 |
122 | Vierra Dairy Farm | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $2,829 |
123 | Hoogendam Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,415 |
124 | Fred Melo | Atwater, CA 95301 | $1,415 |
125 | John S Machado | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,415 |
126 | Silveira Dairy Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $1,415 |
127 | Den K Holsteins Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,415 |
128 | Luis C Nunes & Sons Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,415 |
129 | Charles Ahlem Ranch | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $1,415 |
130 | Homen Dairy Farms Lp | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,415 |
131 | Frank Gwerder Dairy Inc | Modesto, CA 95358 | $1,415 |
132 | Blue Sky Dairy Lp | Atwater, CA 95301 | $1,415 |
133 | Correia Family Dairy Farms LLC | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,415 |
134 | Red Rock Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $1,415 |
135 | Double L & N Dairy | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,415 |
136 | Luis C. Nunes And Sons 2 | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,415 |
137 | Silveira Holsteins | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $1,415 |
138 | Cmc Jerseys, LLC | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $1,415 |
139 | Eduardo Silveira | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,415 |
140 | Maria C Silveira 2011 Trust | Gustine, CA 95322 | $1,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”