Farm Subsidy information
Merced County, California
Total Subsidies in Merced County, California, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 398
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Merced County, California totaled $28,459,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Deborah L Stickles | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $26,780 |
122 | Kandola Farms | Livingston, CA 95334 | $25,618 |
123 | Joe & Renee Barroso & Sons Dairy Lp | Merced, CA 95341 | $25,302 |
124 | Rai Farm Management LLC | Atwater, CA 95301 | $25,061 |
125 | Scott Menefee | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $23,073 |
126 | California Dairy Farms LLC | Merced, CA 95341 | $22,318 |
127 | Daniel Fialho | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $21,779 |
128 | Black Rascal Orchards LLC | Merced, CA 95341 | $21,563 |
129 | , | $21,390 | |
130 | Manuel R Goncalves Jr. | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $20,903 |
131 | De Jager Dairy North | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $20,903 |
132 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $20,903 |
133 | Van Foeken Dairy | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $20,903 |
134 | Matos Dairy | Merced, CA 95341 | $20,903 |
135 | Wesley Bylsma | Merced, CA 95341 | $20,903 |
136 | Alves And Son Dairy | Turlock, CA 95380 | $20,903 |
137 | K & J Fischer 2008 Family Trust- Kenneth Fischer | Ballico, CA 95303 | $20,903 |
138 | Antonio Azevedo | El Nido, CA 95317 | $20,903 |
139 | Alexandrina Azevedo | El Nido, CA 95317 | $20,903 |
140 | Gm Silva Dairies General Partnership | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $20,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”