Market Gains in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 159
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Merced County, California totaled $5,789,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Maxine Price | Snelling, CA 95369 | $3,326 |
122 | Ronald L Toscano | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $3,102 |
123 | Anna Marie Pedrelli Rev Trust | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $2,923 |
124 | James A Areias | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,874 |
125 | Lorenzetti Bros Inc | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $2,573 |
126 | John Tristao Jr | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,505 |
127 | Jack Jensen | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,491 |
128 | Calwings Management Inc | San Juan Bautista, CA 95045 | $2,491 |
129 | Canyon Road Orchards | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,476 |
130 | Peter Lo Bue | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,313 |
131 | Bronson Mendes-lo Bue | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,313 |
132 | Kevin Roberts | Belmont, OH 43718 | $2,196 |
133 | John Barroso | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $1,934 |
134 | The Souza Living Trust-norbert So | Smoot, WY 83126 | $1,811 |
135 | Overholtzer Limited Partnership | Soulsbyville, CA 95372 | $1,777 |
136 | Charles Bayer | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $1,382 |
137 | Nick Boffa | Hollister, CA 95023 | $1,308 |
138 | Anita Giannone | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,231 |
139 | Bert L Johnson | Sonora, CA 95370 | $1,062 |
140 | The Pugliese Family Trust- Dominic Pugliese | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,012 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”