Loan Deficiency in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 949
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Merced County, California totaled $27,843,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Ray Veldhuis | Winton, CA 95388 | $50,541 |
142 | Manuel Mendes | Gustine, CA 95322 | $50,093 |
143 | Stacee Barcellos | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $50,015 |
144 | Jennifer Barcellos | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $50,015 |
145 | Charles Ahlem Ranch | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $49,763 |
146 | Arthur L De Jager | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $49,713 |
147 | Fagundes Dairy | Chowchilla, CA 93610 | $49,546 |
148 | Wolfsen Land & Cattle Co | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $49,292 |
149 | John S Machado | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $48,905 |
150 | Wickstrom Jersey Farms Inc | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $48,599 |
151 | Jones Farms Gp | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $48,203 |
152 | Rodney Nylund Dba Rodney Nylund D | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $48,186 |
153 | Rafael Pacheco | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $47,854 |
154 | Alpha Gipe | Merced, CA 95341 | $47,124 |
155 | Teresina Barcellos | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $47,073 |
156 | Amaral & Sons | Stevinson, CA 95374 | $46,996 |
157 | Felix Proletti Jr | El Nido, CA 95317 | $46,240 |
158 | Brookhurst Farms Gp | Atwater, CA 95301 | $45,893 |
159 | Wayne Harrison | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $45,646 |
160 | Juan Amparan | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $45,549 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”