Deficiency Payment in Merced County, California, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 382
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Merced County, California totaled $1,580,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | T & M Farms | Merced, CA 95340 | $0 |
162 | Robert Gaffery Estate | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $0 |
163 | Souza Bros/norbert & Jerry Dba | Gustine, CA 95322 | $0 |
164 | Keith & Lori Porter Jv | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $0 |
165 | Lewis Maiorino Ranches Inc | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $0 |
166 | Bob & Jim Bertao | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $0 |
167 | Pedrelli Farm Ltd | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $0 |
168 | T.n.t. | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $0 |
169 | Nickel Enterprises | Bakersfield, CA 93386 | $0 |
170 | Joseph & Robin Maiorino | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $0 |
171 | A T B Packing Co | Turlock, CA 95381 | $0 |
172 | Te Velde Revocable Trust | Delhi, CA 95315 | $0 |
173 | John Guerin Bliss | Merced, CA 95340 | $-17 |
174 | Joseph Turner | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $-20 |
175 | German Arroyo | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $-21 |
176 | Cozzi Brothers | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $-27 |
177 | Melvin G Biggs | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $-31 |
178 | Irma Bowling | Dos Palos, CA 93620 | $-32 |
179 | Merced Property | Pasadena, CA 91101 | $-36 |
180 | Jayne Parker | Le Grand, CA 95333 | $-39 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”