Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Merced County, California, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,191

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Merced County, California totaled $92,018,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Bar-mac DairyMerced, CA 95340$520,692
22Dores Dairy PtnStevinson, CA 95374$512,759
23James J Stevinson CorpNewman, CA 95360$500,000
24John & Vicky SeasholtzFresno, CA 93705$500,000
25Martins Bros Dairy Farms GpHilmar, CA 95324$500,000
26Bobby Borba Dba Dairy CentralHilmar, CA 95324$500,000
27Joe Soares DairyDelhi, CA 95315$500,000
28Veldhuis North Dairy GpBallico, CA 95303$500,000
29Frank Coelho & Sons LpEl Nido, CA 95317$500,000
30Paul VanwarmerdamWinton, CA 95388$500,000
31John B Pires And Eldred C Pires PtrGustine, CA 95322$500,000
32Wickstrom Dairies LpHilmar, CA 95324$500,000
33K & J Fischer 2008 Family Trust- Kenneth FischerBallico, CA 95303$500,000
34Antonio Brasil Dairy LpDos Palos, CA 93620$500,000
35Dash Dream Plants IncDos Palos, CA 93620$500,000
36Quail H Farms LLCLivingston, CA 95334$494,176
37Weimer FarmsAtwater, CA 95301$479,461
38Yosemite Jersey DairyHilmar, CA 95324$479,095
39Mike Duarte David Souza PtrAtwater, CA 95301$464,073
40Samran & Sons Farming Co, IncDenair, CA 95316$463,512

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag